You should upgrade or use an alternative browser. Bullywugs are listed among the NPC traits in the 5E DMG. Bullywugs are also shown as an example of a sidekick character in Tasha's (the only example depicted that isn't already officially playable - unless you count the winged kobold). And they recently got more attention in Wild Beyond the Witchlight. Bullywugs were also a PC race in 2E and 4E. Bullywugs aren't especially powerful in 5E, so considering all the above, it seems odd we have yet to see them as a PC race in 5E.
(Wizards also has a mixed record with other frog-folk, for some reason - grungs were a PC race only in the official-but-maybe-not DM Guild product One Grung Below, while Wizards infamously removed grippli PC guidelines from Candlekeep Mysteries. Is there some conspiracy against frog-folk afoot?)
log in or register to remove this ad
Weretoads could be interesting monsters in kid-friendly stories with a little touch of horror.
But, I do agree, we could use a frog people. It's not a bad concept.
Is there some conspiracy against frog-folk afoot?)
Yes. They don't want you to find out.Because nobody wants a party member who constantly sings "It's not easy being green"
It would be interesting to find out how WoTC determines which monsters are suitable to be used as PCs.
It would be interesting to find out how WoTC determines which monsters are suitable to be used as PCs.
I expect it's whatever sells well. And maybe WotC expects that Bullywugs as a PC just won't sell very well?I certainly wouldn't want to play one. They're... well... frogs. Your backstory starts in a pond where you were born as a tadpole. The jokes by other party members would never stop.
I mean, yeah Bullywugs would be nice, but I just refluff the Grung to be Bullywugs/Gripplis mostly. It's the easiest way to do it at this point.
ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7prrWqKmlnF6kv6h706GpnpmUqHy4tNhmmKudnql6o8HLpbCwrZeoeqJ5z5xkq5mTmnqquoxunGduaGyBcoKO